Nov 21, 2018 Last Updated 6:53 AM, Nov 20, 2018

Women and development

Women and development
Published: Jul 01, 2012

Nikki Edwards

Mixed reactions as women document a community development initiative in Bangka Belitung
Nikki Edwards

This special edition of Inside Indonesia presents a variety of views on the extent to which gender-focused initiatives have improved or otherwise changed the day-to-day lives of Indonesian women. A number of the articles focus on the gap between those women who have benefited from development and those who are left behind. Some question the rationale underpinning particular development programs or the true effect of gender-focused government initiatives on women. Others focus on the marginalised women who benefit from development initiatives and consider the ways in which this is occurring.

Rosser sets the scene, writing about how government schemes which provide maternal healthcare to low-income women fail to provide an adequate level of support. He contends that these schemes cannot be fixed with more funding alone, but that they must also concentrate on empowering the mothers they aim to help. In the second article, Ford argues that although labour force participation is improving for women in Indonesia, the effect is not empowering for women across the board, leaving working-class women to shoulder much of the burden of development.

Shifting the focus to consider the effect of development programs more specifically, Elmhirst contends that many gender-focused environmental initiatives fail to address the fundamental unsustainability of exploitative economic development. She argues that while programs which focus on individualising environmental responsibility are problematic for this reason, there is hope in the form of emerging alliances between environmental NGOs and peasants unions, which are now starting to promote the values of ecofeminism.

Also shining a spotlight on development programs, Idrus is critical of ‘gender mainstreaming’ initiatives which set up special programs for women. She argues that all too often the Indonesian government conflates ‘gender equity’ and ‘women’s empowerment’, with the result that gender concerns are isolated from mainstream development practice. Continuing this close focus on the Indonesian government, Suryakusuma argues that the concept of ‘state ibuism’ – a term she coined over two decades ago – still holds relevance in contemporary Indonesia. She writes that although the role of the state has changed, women are still being constructed to fit into a patriarchal order, which now takes the form of a new state sanctioned version of Islam that is increasingly intruding in women’s lives.

The final two articles offer a more up-beat message. Morton’s article about women’s savings schemes in Sulawesi indicates that these kinds of initiatives can improve the situation for at least some women. She explains that by enabling low-income women to borrow very small amounts of money these schemes not only help improve quality of life but also empower participants. Similarly, Nawilis writes about how an alliance between two NGOs in Nusa Tenggara that is helping to empower female heads of households and promote sustainable technology at the same time. This is another example of the kind of small scale initiative that does not register in development indicators but nevertheless is having a positive effect on the lives of the women it assists.

But while positives steps are being made towards gender-focused development and women’s empowerment, there is still a long way to go. As several authors point out, genuinely meeting the needs of women within developing Indonesia is going to depend on more than simply continuing current programs. The concerns raised in articles in this edition offer a starting point for the creation of a reworked development agenda that builds on the lessons of the past in an attempt to achieve genuine gender equity in the future.

Nikki Edwards ( completed Honours in Indonesian Studies at the University of Sydney and is now a Juris Doctor candidate at the University of New South Wales.

Inside Indonesia 109: Jul-Sep 2012


#2 0 Reka Putra 2014-11-01 08:28
yes indeed. It is true that gender inequality in Indonesia encompassed many economic problems. However as Mr Van Der Weerd commented, a more blindingly obvious issue is how woman may seem to be treated unfairly in the Indonesian society. As the largest muslim population in the world, the indonesians find polygamy completely normal as it adheres to the muslim laws. In foreigner eyes though, this may look completely absurd and nonsensical. But in Indonesian society, polygamy and wearing veil is part of daily life and become daily norm.
Thus i think it is sound to discuss gender inequality in Indonesia in economic perspective for now. Until Indonesia becoming more secular, the issue of polygamy and women wearing a veil will be unheard of as gender inequality problem.
#1 0 Jan van der Weerd 2012-09-10 08:37
I am surprised that in this article, all about economic issues, nothing is said about what strikes me (a Westerner, visited Indonesia several times, with vrey close friends there, familiar with their family situations) mostly, as far as gender problems go: the inequality of women and men within families, at a personal level: the often complete acceptance (among men ! but also among some women) of men having more than one wife, whereas one woman having more than one husband is unheard of. Many women having to wear veils, men can dress as they like. Different ways boys and girls are treated when growing up. The authority of men over women. All this seems to me as least as important as the issues mentioned in the article.

Latest Articles

Essay: Contesting urban beauty in Jakarta


Source/ Doyle & Ekin  Wish images

Walking Jakarta’s northern coastline reveals communities experiencing disruptive and rapid change

Photo essay: Hope in the face of disaster


Source/ Melanie Filler & Tim Barretto

Palu after the tsunami

Surviving while seeking asylum

Oct 26, 2018 - GEMIMA HARVEY

Hazara asylum seeker Shiringul first fled Afghanistan to Pakistan and then when the danger spread to Pakistan, she was forced to flee again, this time to Indonesia. She said the streets outside of Kalideres immigration detention centre were her best option. Source/ Gemima Harvey

A change in Australia’s asylum policy has denied refugees in Indonesia vital support

Review: The killing season

Oct 01, 2018 - FRANK BEYER

More than 50 years on, mis-truths about the 1965-66 killings and what motivated them prevail in Indonesia. Geoffrey Robinson's and other books and films on the issue, based on archival research...

Subscribe to Inside Indonesia

Receive Inside Indonesia's latest articles and quarterly editions in your inbox.


Lontar Modern Indonesia



A selection of stories from the Indonesian classics and modern writers, periodically published free for Inside Indonesia readers, courtesy of Lontar